Service 3

Marketing strategy and systems

The strategic and technical work your team is missing.

What it is

CRM selection and implementation, donor and constituent journey mapping, grant-side infrastructure, workflow automation, and the strategic marketing work that connects all of it to mission outcomes. This is the work for organizations that have technology they're not using well, funder relationships that need stronger digital credibility, or manual processes that should be running automatically.

The right entry point is usually an audit. Whether it's a HubSpot instance nobody knows how to operate, a digital presence that doesn't survive a program officer's review, or a manual intake process burning staff hours - the diagnostic surfaces what to fix first. Implementation follows from there.

CRM work is tech-stack-agnostic. HubSpot is the primary tool, informed by director-level operator experience at a global company - not partner certification. Salesforce NPSP is available for donor-heavy organizations with existing Salesforce. CiviCRM is the right answer when full ownership and no per-seat cost matter most. The recommendation follows the situation, not what the consultant is certified to sell.

I've also sat on the funding side. As an El Pomar Fellow, I evaluated grant applications and presented $1.2 million in funding recommendations to the board. That experience shapes everything here: I know what program officers actually weigh when they pull up your website, review your reporting, or assess whether your organization is as mature as your narrative claims.

For organizations handling sensitive constituent data - domestic violence services, immigration legal aid, health-adjacent programs - there's a self-hosted path. Workflow automation, local AI processing, and file management on private infrastructure, grounded in systems I run in production. Not a concept - a running stack.

Who it's for

Mid-size nonprofit marketing teams with real technology (HubSpot, Salesforce, Mailchimp with automation) that nobody on staff can configure or interpret. Organizations whose CRM was set up by someone who left. Executive Directors preparing for a major grant cycle who need their digital presence to survive funder scrutiny. Organizations spending staff hours on manual processes that should run automatically. Privacy-critical organizations evaluating self-hosted alternatives to standard SaaS.

What it produces

Depends on the engagement. Common outputs include:

How it works

  1. A diagnostic conversation. What you have, what it's doing, what you need it to do.
  2. A written assessment with specific, prioritized recommendations. Not a list of upsells, not a 40-page slide deck.
  3. Implementation support for what you decide to build: hands-on configuration, not documentation hand-off.
  4. Ongoing advisory as needed. The relationship is more useful if it continues than if it ends at delivery.

Proof

Director-level HubSpot operation at TopSource Worldwide: lead scoring, attribution modeling, MQL-to-SQL workflows, $750K budget, 30% quarterly lead growth. El Pomar Foundation Fellow: evaluated grant applications, presented $1.2 million in funding recommendations, served as foundation liaison to grantees across rural Colorado. Email marketing at Dental Lifeline Network: 24,000-subscriber network, 24 state-specific campaigns. "Will You See One Veteran?" campaign across 38 states with three corporate sponsors generating $3.5 million in donated care. Live production homelab: Proxmox cluster, n8n automations, Jitsi Meet with custom recording modules, local AI models - the same infrastructure pattern a privacy-critical organization needs.

Common questions

How do you decide which CRM to recommend?

After the discovery call, not before. HubSpot for marketing-driven orgs, Salesforce NPSP for donor-heavy orgs with existing Salesforce, CiviCRM when full ownership and no per-seat cost matter. The recommendation depends on your size, budget, team familiarity, and existing data.

Do we need to start with an audit?

Usually. The audit surfaces what to fix first and prevents spending budget on the wrong thing. If you already know the problem, we can scope the project directly.

Is AI part of these services?

Where it genuinely fits. Meeting transcription, document drafting, grant report helpers. But most automation is more reliable with deterministic scripts and workflows. AI is a tool in the toolbox, not the headline.

What does private infrastructure mean?

Self-hosted alternatives to standard SaaS: file management, workflow automation, local AI processing, on servers you control. For organizations where data sensitivity makes third-party storage a real concern.

Do you do fractional marketing leadership?

Yes, on a monthly retainer with capped hours. Good for organizations that need senior marketing thinking without the cost of a full-time hire.

If this sounds like what you need.

Talk about your situation